BY Sallieu S. Kanu
Sierra Leone – February 13, 2026: The remand of Lansana Dumbuya, National Secretary General of the All Peoples Congress (APC), after his bail was denied on Thursday, has triggered strong reactions from within the party. Several APC flagbearer aspirants have issued statements condemning the development and warning of its implications for Sierra Leone’s democratic space.
Dumbuya was charged with incitement, insulting conduct, and public insult against President Julius Maada Bio following remarks allegedly made at an APC rally on January 31. Despite pleading not guilty, he was denied bail and remanded to Pademba Road Correctional Facility. The case has drawn attention because the APC had already paid fines to the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC) over related issues, raising questions about fairness and proportionality.
Flagbearer Aspirants’ Statements
Hon. Chernor Ramadan Maju Bah (Chericoco) called for fairness, restraint, and respect for democratic space. He stressed that the law must not be used as a tool of political intimidation and urged APC members to remain calm, disciplined, and united.
Dr. Ibrahim Bangura expressed concern that the detention stems from the same alleged offence for which the APC had already been fined. He emphasized tolerance, fairness, and lawful application of bail, while urging party stakeholders to prioritize unity and survival of the APC.
Mayor Yvonne Aki-Sawyerr observed that the timing of the detention is “deeply troubling”, warning that it risks shrinking Sierra Leone’s democratic space at a time when openness and dialogue are most needed.
Ady Macauley strongly criticized the suspension of the APC and the detention of Dumbuya, describing them as “a dark and grievous chapter” for democracy. He argued that a “dangerous line was crossed” and urged supporters to remain steadfast, declaring that the party’s “journey to victory begins here.”
The remand of the APC Secretary General has heightened political tensions in Sierra Leone, with opposition figures framing it as a test of democratic governance and judicial independence. Observers note that the case will be closely monitored, as it could set precedents for how political dissent and opposition activities are treated in the country.